This review paints a pretty bleak picture.
This pre-emptive attempt to define the epitaph of the Afghanistan war (made by a
U.S. official at NATO) could almost be the one-line summary of Rajiv
Chandrasekaran's Little America. The author himself spreads the blame
even wider. "Our government was incapable of meeting the challenge. Our generals
and diplomats were too ambitious and arrogant. Our uniformed and civilian
bureaucracies were rife with internal rivalries... Our development experts were
inept. Our leaders were distracted."
We need not stop at Nawa and Garmser. The whole operation in Afghanistan
departed far from its original objectives, which were to deal a blow to al-Qaeda
and reduce its chances of attacking America again. The United States could
surely have dealt al-Qaeda a greater blow with the half a trillion dollars that
it has spent in Afghanistan, if it had spent a large part of that money
elsewhere (Egypt, Somalia, Yemen, Mali...). As this book implies, it would have
done a better job in Afghanistan, too, if it had spent less money and been more
focused on its original goal.
Here is the transcript of interview Hugh Hewitt had with the author of Little America, Rajiv Chandrasekaran.
From WAPO: Obama's troop increase was misdirected (excerpts from the book).
No comments:
Post a Comment