Column at USA Today on having federal government officials pay a surtax on their incomes after leaving the federal government.
. . .we see the "revolving door" in almost all industries and sectors of
government, and it's a corrupting influence on both government and
industry. So, for example, ObamaCare architect Liz Fowler left government for a high-paying Big Pharma job, while top Obama Administration officials are looking for high-paying K street lobbying jobs.
How high-paying? "Salaries for former Obama cabinet officials could
start at $1 million while former assistants and special assistants can
make more than $500,000 and $300,000, respectively." Likewise, in 2011,
a few months after approving a controversial merger involving Comcast,
Republican-appointed Federal Communications Commission member Meredith
Attwell Baker left to take a high-paying job at . . . Comcast.
In short, I propose putting a 50% surtax -- or maybe it should be 75%,
I'm open to discussion -- on the post-government earnings of government
officials. So if you work at a cabinet level job and make $196,700
a year, and you leave for a job that pays a million a year, you'll pay
50% of the difference -- just over $400,000 -- to the Treasury right off
the top. So as not to be greedy, we'll limit it to your first five
years of post-government earnings; after that, you'll just pay whatever
standard income tax applies.
No comments:
Post a Comment